Archive

Posts Tagged ‘State’

Stateless Distributed Membership

May 26th, 2010

At this past IIW, I convened a session to ask if and how it might be possible to do a stateless distributed membership for a website. There are two main ideas behind this proposal. First, I don’t really NEED to have a membership database of my own. That is, I don’t need to have another place for you to create an account, user ID and password. We can use OpenID, Information Cards, or other technologies for authenticating and authorizing you. Second, if I want to move toward a world where you control your own data, I don’t need to maintain the database of your comments. I only need to know where your comments are stored so I can properly assemble things as needed. It’s convenient but not technically necessary to own and control all the bits myself.

My proposal for a Stateless Distributed Membership is a mouthful, so I’ll unpack it a bit. There are three parts: a membership, being stateless, and being distributed.

Membership

Let me start with the easy part. You probably understand the idea of membership as a group or association of people contributing to something like a conversation or project. They’re members of a group, or in my case, members of a conversation or project on my site. Nothing unusual about this idea.

Being Stateless

Next is the idea of being stateless. In computer science, the http protocol that you use to call a web page and associated resources is stateless because you call a page from the URL or a link in your browser, the server responds by sending the page, graphics, or whatever, then you see it. Each request is separate; there’s no need to stay connected to the servers. In my case, being “stateless” means that each transaction is independent. Eve Maler talks about a stateless identity in her post Both a data borrower and a data lender be:

This is a kind of data statelessness, in that when you tell various sites they can set, read, and republish your [information from your Personal Data Store], they’re letting go of any pretense of exclusive hosting control so that they can offer you a different kind of value.

Now, in the IdM and VRM worlds, some of us have been talking about identity statelessness for a while, which is similar but looks more like straight data-sharing (reading) rather than arbitrary service access (setting).

For some reason this is a tougher sell — even though CRM systems and user accounts are shot through with pale copies of stale data (and, in the enterprise case, even though syncing directories and replicating databases is brittle and no fun).

Even when one party — say, you yourself — is authoritative for some piece of personal data (like your home address), all the sites insist on making you provision a copy of this data into their profile pages by hand and by value, and insist on thinking they own something truly valuable even after you move and forget to tell them.

The bottom line: if I don’t insist on “owning” your data, we both will realize more value from our trust and flexibility. It’s daring, and in the larger scheme of things, I believe it’s a Good Thing.

Distributed

Finally, the term distributed refers to the fact that all parts of the conversation or projects are stored elsewhere on the net. If you wish to add a comment to a conversation on my server, your comment is added to your personal datastore (wherever it is, and whatever form it might take). When you wish to read the conversation, my server compiles the contributions as needed.

In this model, I do need to maintain a database of where to find your comments and a way to authorize you as the person who granted permission for me to include them in the conversation on my website. But think of it: if you want to revoke permission for me to use your comments, you can. How revolutionary (and potentially messy) is that?

Furthermore, you may choose to log in using an identity that’s different from the last one you used. That works on my server. For example, you might wish to be a regular person contributing to most conversations, but if you’re a professional fundraiser and one of the threads is about raising funds for a non-profit, you may wish to disclose your work and position in that context. Your two identities describe different parts of your life, and you may have good reasons to keep those parts separate.

The IIW Session

In my session, I described this concept and asked what people thought about it. I offered three scenarios where people might interact. One of them: a conversation or forum where blog posts and trackbacks can help create a threaded conversation. The session is an hour-long exploration and discovery of the possibilities. If you have questions or can add a piece to this puzzle, I’d love to hear from you.

My heartfelt thanks go to the people with whom I’ve spoken about this, including =JeffH, Eve, the guy at the end of the video talking with me about trackbacks (I’m sorry I can’t find your name), several others who made great suggestions and shared ideas at my session, and Joe, who spent considerable time exploring underlying frameworks with me.

Coaching moment: You probably have more than one account online, and have likely cursed the problem of forgetting user names and passwords. You may have wished that the picture of you holding a beer wasn’t online for your boss to see. Maybe you’ve been spooked by an advertisement for something that you really didn’t want. If you could do things differently, what would you do? How do you handle your accounts now? Do you feel secure about your online practices? Do you even want to be in control? Not everyone does.

future, records, tools , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Your Citizen-Self

April 16th, 2009

Uncle Sam Yesterday was April 15, which in the United States is a day of particular significance: Tax Day.

For most people Tax Day is a day of dread: they calculate (using increasingly complex rules) how much money they made during the year, how much of it was taxable, and how much money they owe the government. By midnight, the forms and money need to be postmarked and/or filed with the United States Treasury. After all, it’s “very expensive to run a government,” especially these days.

For nearly all of us, Tax Day also signifies our citizenship in the United States (our national identity) and of the state in which we are “domiciled” (where we live with intent to stay). Some parts of our lives that contribute to and define this identity:

Federal State
  • Our voting registration and records, which are supposed to be anonymous but for the fact that we showed up at the polls
  • Our passport, which allows us to travel out of the country
  • Our social security number and records
  • Our tax records
  • Other records
  • Our Driver’s license
  • Our real property, taxes and records
  • Business and other licenses
  • Other records

Coaching moment: What’s with the Other Records?

Various things (activities, circumstances, events) might result in our having other records with the government. These things may or may not be recorded with your knowledge. For example, have you ever applied for citizenship in another country? been in a public place where surveillance cameras are running? have the same name as someone famous? Sometimes it’s the crazy stuff that gets recorded. You might be interested to know about this other information that the government has on you.

You have access to government records through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).The National Freedom of Information Coalition has a great page with sample FOIA letters that you can use to find out who knows what. You’ll need to write at least a couple of letters–to the Federal government and to the state(s) where you have lived.

Knowledge is power. If you want to know what these agencies know about you, it’s worth your time to write some letters (keep track of whom you wrote) and find out what, if anything, they have about you. After all, this is Your Citizen-Self.

history, records, tools , , , , , , , , , , ,

Switch to our mobile site