Voluntary personal information sharing comes naturally to most of us. When given an opportunity, a few tools, and a community in which we can share our most intimate details, many people don’t hesitate to document their every movement and mood. We readily identify our friends and our preferences, and even document our vices.
Facebook is the place right now where a great many people share the most detailed information about themselves. Are you on Facebook? If so, you might be interested in a new site called I Shared What?!? that will open a window for you into what Facebook sees–and lets others see.
Coaching moment: Did you know you were sharing this much information? Do you know who has access to it, for how long, and for what purposes? Does this make you uncomfortable? Why?
Sentient Developments has a thought provoking post called Cognitive liberty and right to one’s mind that talks about cognitive liberty, neurodiversity, and the right to control one’s own mind. Author George Dvorsky states that, while there may be compelling reasons why treatment might be appropriate (like for people engaged in criminally harmful behavior), it may be undesirable to “cure” those who are neurologically different (because of Aspergers or autism, for example). From the article:
Cognitive liberty is not just about the right to modify one’s mind, emotional balance and psychological framework (for example, through anti-depressants, cognitive enhancers, psychotropic substances, etc.), it’s also very much about the right to not have one’s mind altered against their will. In this sense, cognitive liberty is very closely tied to freedom of speech. A strong argument can be made that we have an equal right to freedom of thought and the sustained integrity of our subjective experiences.
Coaching moment: Your mind is a big part of what makes you unique in the world. You may choose to alter your mind by learning, drugs, television, or many other means. This is your choice. However, I doubt that many people would be supportive of a nationwide drug program to make us all the same (as if that were possible, which I also doubt).
This reminds me of a short story by Kurt Vonnegut called Harrison Bergeron. It starts out:
THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren’t only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. …
The future will not be so kind as Vonnegut. We will need all forms of our diversity to tackle some of our own global problems and creations. We are better served by learning how to listen and learn from each other. Each of us is unique. Together we are still different. That is our strength if we allow for it.
This video is an interesting romp through time, illustrating special effects and what can be shown visually. What does this have to do with digital identity? Several things:
The world is not always as it appears
Some people want you to see the world in a particular (non-real) way
You can show the world who you are in a particular (real or non-real) way
A personal identity is an interpretive dance between the person offering and the person accepting or using some information
Not all information (like details of how the effects were created) needs to be revealed
Coaching moment: You are, at some points in time and in certain circumstances, the director, designer, and special effects creator of your own life. You can choose what to show, what to withhold, and what parts of you become the picture that others see. For example, you may not choose to talk about last night’s bar crawl when you’re at work, being a model employee. You may choose to reveal more information about your activities to your doctor, in order to assist an appropriate diagnosis. You may choose to portray indifference and anonymity to an annoying panhandler on the street.
What happens when someone else follows you around, blowing your cover? That’s what many companies are doing now when they collect and trade your data. These companies are saying, in effect, “we know who you are, you can not hide from us.” However, what they “know” may not be true or accurate. See, for example, What the Internet Knows About You – a site that says you’ve “visited” URLs that may have only shown up on your visited pages as advertising or invisible pixels. Or take a look at your annual credit card summary to see that your favorite local hardware store is categorized as a “specialty foods” (or some other clearly erroneous) category.
Why might you care about this? Many of these companies and related trading partners are making decisions about you based on this information. They are not asking you to verify–nor are you given the opportunity to refute–inaccurate or incorrect information. Is this the kind of decision making that you want to be steering your life? (I don’t.) This is a version of making decisions about your finances based on identity theft, or about your insurability based on someone else’s records.
What can you do about it? First: be aware of this practice. Choose to work with businesses that are collaborative and will help you verify your data. There aren’t many of them yet. As they show up in the marketplace, they will need your support. Second: order a credit report from any (each) of the big three data companies. Correct what’s wrong. Know what they say. Third: Talk with your friends about this. You may be interested to learn who cares and who does not. Ultimately this is your priority, not someone else’s.